Perspective on the significance of the marea court case in Research Paper

Perspective on the significance of the margona court case in understanding some aspect of the larger world of 17th ampere-second Massac - Research Paper ExampleRegardless of this fact, it is the responsibility of the historian/researcher to accurately depict the situation and not give way to the temptation to whole relate the most interesting/salacious aspects of the story due to the fact that these do not help to give the full story and only underscore the beliefs and actions of those with the most divergent cycloramas among the culture/group in question. Although the trials have been mythified and turned into a cultural phenomenon, the fact remains that even though the number of executions were upset and the incident was isolated, the prevailing beliefs of that time with coitus to how the settlers/Puritan viewed the world in which they lived worked to have a profound effect on how justice was carried out with relation to those supposedly involved in some form or opposite of conjuring or witchcraft. From the court data as well as the other primary and secondary data that can be analyzed, it is clear that many factors greatly impeded the case against Marea as it relates to her trial for murder of her own neonate infant. As much(prenominal), the project of this analysis is not to provide a firm case for or against her guilt in the situation that much should be obvious. Instead, the purpose is to carefully review some of the statements made by the dep iodinnts with relation to those testified to Mareas innocence/guilt. ... the ways in which these deponents related the information they had come across, the level to which these influences are exhibited in the affirmation provides ample evidence of how information was interpreted, accepted by the court, and acted upon based upon the biases of the individuals responsible for providing such testimony and the jurors beliefs as they related to the understanding and screening of this knowledge. As such, the i ndividual depositions contained strong references the beliefs in here say as tantamount to proof. This was so prevalent throughout many of the testimonies that if it were extent in a courtroom of our time it would clearly be disregarding as a clear abrogation of justice. However, to the individuals involved in the case during the sixteenth century such cultural, social, and religious norms were perfectly accepted both in society and within the court as a defining merit of their unique and peculiar society. such(prenominal) inclusion of here say as a type of circumstantial evidence is noted in many court cases of the same period.2 The first of these testimonies is that of doubting Thomas Drake. Of all the testimonies, Thomas Drakes is interesting in that it does not make any of the broad sweeping stereotypical judgments that the other deponents make in their testimony. Thomas Drakes testimony can be seen as rambling and inclusive of a lot of unnecessary facts however, the fact remain s that he appears to present the most impartial and non-aligned view of those that were sampled in the testimony that is available to draw inference upon. Although it cannot be asserted definitively, it is interesting to question whether Thomas Drake was originally born in the colonies or was one of the first settlers due to the fact that his age at the time of the testimony puts